Let's be honest. Barack Obama is not on the verge of clinching the Democratic nomination because of his policy positions--whatever his most evangelical supporters might tell you. If policy was all that mattered this year, Hillary Clinton would've won five or six of the last 11 contests instead of losing them all. When it comes to specifics, there's simply not that much space between the candidates.
Obama's success owes a lot, of course, to his message--the promise to pass Democratic policies by rallying a "coalition for change." But watching Obamamania over the past few weeks, I've become convinced that there's something more subtle at work, too. It's not just the message and the man and the speeches that are swaying Democratic voters--though they are. It's the way the campaign has folded the man and the message and the speeches into a systemic branding effort. Reinforced with a coherent, comprehensive program of fonts, logos, slogans and web design, Obama is the first presidential candidate to be marketed like a high-end consumer brand.* And for folks who don't necessarily need Democratic social programs--upscale voters, young people--I suspect that the novel comfort of that brand affiliation contributes (however subconsciously) to his appeal.
Seeking expert opinion, I tested my hypothesis on leading graphic designer and critic Michael Bierut, who was kind enough to dissect Obama's unprecedented branding campaign--and show me how it's helping his candidacy. Excerpts:
(*UPDATE: A reader points out that "Reagan had one hell of a
marketing strategy." No doubt. Every presidential candidate
since Richard Nixon in 1968 (at least) was
actively "marketed" to the American public--I'm not denying that. The
point I'm trying to make is that Obama's marketing is much more
cohesive and comprehensive than anything we've seen before, involving
fonts, logos and web design in a way that transcends the mere
appropriation of commercial tactics to achieve the sort of seamless
brand identity that the most up-to-date companies strive for.
Apologies for the misunderstanding. I definitely could have been clearer.)
What are the elements of the Obama brand?
To start, he has this way of writing Obama in upper and lowercase in a serif font and juxtaposing it with that "O" symbol
he has--the blue ring with red and white stripes disappearing into it,
making the white form inside the blue look like what I suppose is meant
to be a rising sun. [See photo above]
That's his "logo," right?
Right.
A lot of times when he's at a podium what you'll see is, centered right
beneath him, at the very top of the blue field that usually says
something like "Change You Can Believe In," it'll be just that little
symbol, functioning in the same way the Nike swoosh does. People look
at that and know what it means, even though it's just an "O" with some
stripes in it.
Has any other campaign ever "pulled a Nike"?
Well,
Bush did that the last time around with the letter "W," to some degree.
You would see somebody with the letter "W" on a bumper sticker, and it
would kind of work that way. But Obama has gotten there much quicker
and a little more gracefully, if you ask me.
How else is Obama's design different than what has come before--or what rival campaigns are doing?
He's the first candidate, actually, who's had a coherent,
top-to-bottom, 360-degree system at work. Whereas, I think it's more
more common for politicians to have a bumper-sticker symbol that they just
stick on everything and hope that that will
carry the day.
The thing that sort of flabbergasts me as a professional graphic designer is that, somewhere along the way, they decided that all their graphics would basically be done in the same typeface, which is this typeface called Gotham. [See "Change We Can Believe In" sign, above] If you look at one of his rallies, every single non-handmade sign is in that font. Every single one of them. And they're all perfectly spaced and perfectly arranged. Trust me. I've done graphics for events --and I know what it takes to have rally after rally without someone saying, "Oh, we ran out of signs, let's do a batch in Arial." It just doesn't seem to happen. There's an absolute level of control that I have trouble achieving with my corporate clients.
Then if you go to the Web site, it's all reflected there too--all the same elements showing up in this clean, smooth, elegant way. It all ties together really, really beautifully as a system.
Is Obama's stuff on the level with the best commercial brand design?
I think it's just as good or better. I have sophisticated clients who
pay me and other people well to try to keep them on the straight and
narrow, and they have trouble getting everything set in the same
typeface. And he seems to be able to do it in Cleveland and Cincinnati
and Houston and San Antonio. Every time you look, all those signs are
perfect. Graphic designers like me don't understand how it's happening.
It's unprecedented and inconceivable to us. The people in the know are
flabbergasted.
【免费咨询报名电话:010-6801 7975】
咨询报名MSN:xueliedu@hotmail.com
试一试网上报名
咨询报名QQ:
1505847972 | 1256358232 | 1363884583 | 1902839745 | 800072298 | 754854002 |
中专升大专 | 中专升本科 | 高升专 | 高升本 | 专升本 | 自考 |