返回首页
当前位置: 主页 > 新闻资讯 >

Why the liberal base has so little leverage with Obama(6)

时间:2011-11-04 01:03来源: 作者:admin 点击:
It’s impossible to know, for example, the exposure of the Street to European banks in danger of going under. To stay afloat, Europe’s banks will be forced to sell mountains of assets – among them,
  

It’s impossible to know, for example, the exposure of the Street to European banks in danger of going under. To stay afloat, Europe’s banks will be forced to sell mountains of assets – among them, derivatives originating on the Street – and may have to reneg on or delay some repayments on loans from Wall Street banks.

The Street says it’s not worried because these assets are insured. But remember AIG? The fact Morgan Stanley and other big U.S. banks are taking a beating in the market suggests investors don’t believe the Street. This itself proves financial reform hasn’t gone far enough.

If you want more evidence, consider the fancy footwork by Bank of America in recent days. Hit by a credit downgrade last month, BofA just moved its riskiest derivatives from its Merrill Lynch unit to a retail subsidiary flush with insured deposits. That unit has a higher credit rating because the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (that is, you and me and other taxpayers) are backing the deposits. Result: BofA improves its bottom line at the expense of American taxpayers.

Wasn’t this supposed to be illegal? Keeping risky assets away from insured deposits had been a key principle of U.S. regulation for decades before the repeal of Glass-Steagall.

The so-called “Volcker rule” was supposed to remedy that. But under pressure of Wall Street’s lobbyists, the rule – as officially proposed last week – has morphed into almost 300 pages of regulatory mumbo-jumbo, riddled with exemptions and loopholes.

It would have been far simpler simply to ban proprietary trading from the jump. Why should banks ever be permitted to use peoples’ bank deposits – insured by the federal government – to place risky bets on the banks’ own behalf? Bring back Glass-Steagall.

True, Glass-Steagall wouldn’t have prevented the fall of Lehman Brothers or the squeeze on other investment banks in 2007 and 2008. That’s why it’s also necessary to break up the big banks.

In the wake of the bailout, the biggest banks are bigger than ever. Twenty years ago the ten largest banks on the Street held 10 percent of America’s total bank assets. Now they hold over 70 percent. And the biggest four have a larger market share than ever – so large, in fact, they’ve almost surely been colluding. How else to explain their apparent coordination on charging debit card fees?

The banks aren’t even fulfilling their fiduciary duties to investors. Last summer, after Groupon selected Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Credit Suisse to underwrite its initial public offering, the trio valued it at a generous $30 billion. Subsequent accounting and disclosure problems showed this estimate to be absurdly high. Did the banks care? Not a wit. The higher the valuation, the fatter their fees.

Just last week Citigroup settled charges (without admitting or denying guilt) that it defrauded investors by selling them a package of mortgage-backed securities rife with mortgages it knew were likely to default, but didn’t disclose the hazard. It then bet against the package for its own benefit – earning fees of $34 million and net profits of at least $126 million. So what’s Citi paying to settle this outrage? A mere $285 million. Its CEO at time (Charles Prince) doesn’t pay a dime.

I doubt the President will be condemning the Street’s antics, or calling for a resurrection of Glass-Steagall and a breakup of the biggest banks. Democrats are still too dependent on the Street’s campaign money.

That’s too bad. You don’t have to be an occupier of Wall Street to conclude the Street is still out of control. And that’s dangerous for all of us.

Continue Reading

Robert Reich, a professor of public policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was secretary of labor during the Clinton administration. He is also a blogger and the author of "Aftershock: The Next Economy and America's Future."  More Robert Reich

  • Permalink
  • Print
  • Short URL
  • Share:
  • Wednesday, Oct 26, 2011 12:00 AM UTC2011-10-26T00:00:00Zl, M j, Y g:i A T President Obama picks a worthy enemy

    Mitch McConnell committed the GOP to blocking his agenda before Inauguration Day. Finally he's fighting back VIDEO

    By Joan Walsh

    Mitch McConnell

    Mitch McConnell (Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed)

    Topics:Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., bill daley

    If Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell doesn’t want to be portrayed as a “villain,” he should stop acting like one. On Sunday, McConnell complained about President Obama’s efforts to make Republicans the bad guys for blocking his jobs bill. Now Obama’s taking the fight directly to McConnell, and it’s about time.


    【免费咨询报名电话:010-6801 7975】

    咨询报名MSN:xueliedu@hotmail.com
    试一试网上报名
    咨询报名QQ:
    中专升大专 中专升本科 高升专 高升本 专升本 自考在线老师
    1505847972 1256358232 1363884583 1902839745 800072298 754854002
    中专升大专 中专升本科 高升专 高升本 专升本 自考

    数据统计中!!
    顶一下
    (0)
    0%
    踩一下
    (0)
    0%
    ------分隔线----------------------------
    报名咨询方式
    免费咨询报名热线:010-5128 0865
    咨询报名QQ:172656761
    咨询报名MSN:xueliedu@hotmail.com
    免费咨询专升本 自考本科自考专科自考专升本 出国留学 昌平校区在线咨询:自考本科,自考学历国家承认! msn在线咨询
    推荐内容
    专升本,高升本,自考,成考